Parts, Cases, Levels, Frames and Justice's Criteria

In any deal, parts are either actors of the same level or same ranks (in any well roles assigned process) or of different levels like individual actor (always somehow so) and its whole society (also at least a little bit, but could be playing positivelly or neigativelly), as they can be. Manking then complex programs with combination, confusion and intermediate situations between 2 extreme ideals..

Next olicognograph shows 4 situation, as leveled 2 x 2. Sort of supra-relations can be managed under criteria of justice as suggested at each corner of the table.. According the material case it is to set before which better frame can apply to a given problem of deal, according type of negociation, problems of rights or duties and also where uses and customs have their role(s).

Levels can also be parts of different logics. Frames can be detailed the same way like 2 x 2 innner case for each corner, using here like a small symbol? Could be like respective rights and duties crossed between parts. Observe that this cellular process helps to incorporates supra-level (previously introduced), since the common rights and duties of any parts relate infra to supra levels. Meanwhile at the level, the rights of one part make the duties of the other part and at the reverse.

Finally the criteria or concept of justice are here suggested to articulate making more sustainable their combinations: Pareto's, Hicks-Kaldor, Rawls-Zaqat and of other types, including our 'oignon' one - 'bulbish' would be less popular.