Consider human unit as nothing static because doing nothing does not make him/her stay at equilibrium. He/she cannot miss that he/she has to act, do something since just maintaining need minimum of movments to secure his/her existence. The same should be said of any living system. Only to analyze better according biological genii. Even trees and plants have to succeeding to move somewhere and make roots. Movments may have existed before, if life appear as moving entities in waters by the flows of waters themselves. Earth plants do not move from where they have roots but they expand roots downward where mineral nutrients and expand leaves upward to catch light better.
This makes movment the first stage to consider and lack of movments more a special case for some specific functions: of restoration, inner absorption, constructions requiring more energy and so on. This is well with what olicognography formelly suggests. Formalism should start since a more real level of complex representation. Reduced by the plane of simple drawing from 3 dimensions, managed so even when with the 2 dimensions of the drawing. lowering down only for special purpose. Adding more dimensions since general calculability, only with properties allowing to solve. Including at starting levels inclusion of uncertainty and mechanisms establishing complexity. Topos even with formal science is the start, linearity not reality, lines not without hilum
So forth with humans as natural engineers both with means they have (the first being their minds, made real with tools and technologic and social scale they play. Tools and technology can set first on visual most advanced sense but, it is the brain that is seing and analyzing. Other footstepping being social, as social constructions and their second option, after looking could be language, carrying explainations of hidden cause. In any case it is not purelyonly of one type of perception. So also there, between two to four is a minimum, even if some ordering can structure. So you cannot separate human from a minimum of environment, even conceptual. Individualism, as a formal reduction is as absurd as utilitarist dogma of pure liberty. But communism as pure democratic issue is also utopia clearly historically a very bloody joke. There is no such things as pure thing as money. You need anyhow some big heap of manure.