Water Pollution Remediation |
||||||||||||||||
Wastewater contaminant concern |
|
|
Example of load capacity in bed contamination treatment |
|||||||||||||
suspend solids |
pathogens & parasites |
piority pollutants |
heavy metal |
|
|
area m2 |
stock.m3 |
contaminant |
water spill method |
|||||||
biodegradable organics |
nutrients |
refractory organics |
disolved inorg -anics |
|
|
23750 |
3475 |
fuel hydrocarbonpolycycyclic aromatic |
drain/spill to water treatment station |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2500 |
275 |
gasoil |
||||||||
Summary of Water Pollution Control Technologies |
||||||||||||||||
technology |
Ppm applicable concentration |
Capacity range gpm |
Removal efficiency |
Capital costs US$ / l |
Year operative cost US$ / l |
Secondary waste |
advantage |
limitations |
||||||||
Thermal oxidation recuperative |
100 - 2000 |
1000 - 500000 |
0.98 |
5.5 - 102 |
8 - 46 |
Combustion products |
0.95 energy recovery possible |
/ halogenated - if: downstream treatment |
||||||||
Thermal oxidation regenerative |
100 - 2000 |
1000 - 500000 |
0.98 |
15.5 - 230 |
10.5 - 77 |
Combustion products |
0.95 energy recovery possible |
/ halogenated- if: downstream treatment |
||||||||
Catalytic oxidation fixed bed |
100 - 2000 |
1000 - 100000 |
0.94 |
10 - 128 |
5 - 38 |
Combustion products |
0.7 energy recovery possible |
Thermal variability & /hologenated - if: downstream treatment |
||||||||
Catalytic oxidation fluidized bed |
100 - 2000 |
1000 - 100000 |
0.94 |
18 - 113 |
8 - 46 |
Combustion products |
0.7 energy recovery possible |
Thermal variability & /hologenated - if: downstream treatment |
||||||||
Carbon absorption |
20 - 5000 |
100 - 60000 |
0.94 |
8 - 62 |
5 - 18 |
Spent carbon, collected organic |
Well in cyclic processes |
Not recommmended in stream RH > 50%, ketones, aldehydes, esther, clog carbon pores |
||||||||
Photocatalytic oxidation |
< 1000 |
< 20000 |
0.92 |
31 - 164 |
2.6 - 46 |
Oxidation products |
Modular design, low ow, low operating cost |
Solar alvailability & / halogenated may require equipment |
||||||||
Photocatalytic oxidation, electric |
< 1000 |
< 20000 |
0.96 |
8 - 133 |
2.6 - 51 |
Oxidation products |
Modular design |
/ halogenated may require equipment |
||||||||
Water Pollution Study |
||||||||||||||||
Pollution of groundwater |
Priority pollutants to be considered |
|||||||||||||||
Diffuse pollution input from different sources: including atmosphere, fertili-zers and crop |
Local pollution from point sources including industrial sites and waste dumps. |
Subsurface infrastructure pollution including storage |
Agrochemicals including fertilizers and pesticides |
Hormones and antibiotics |
Fuels and other solvents |
Metals including radionuclides |
Microorganisms and viruses |
|||||||||
Pollutant mass transport types |
Type or subtype of models |
|||||||||||||||
soluble and well mixing (diluting) species that do not change water flow and rock wettability properties, advec-tion, dispersion, diffusion & |
soluble & well mixing (diluting) species that change water flow & rock wettability properties; advec-tion, dispersion, diffusion mecha-nisms are involved but little retarda-tion |
soluble, but poorly mixing cases due to a change in the water density and flow properties; advection, disper-sion, diffusion and retardation (coo-ling) mechanisms are involved; |
nonsoluble but well mixing species that do not change wa-ter flow and rock wettability pro-perties; advection, dispersion & |
Poorly soluble but nonmixing fluids creating multi-phase flow condi-tions; advection, dispersion & retar-dation (sorption, oxidation, decay) are active within the pollutant phase flow domain, solu- tion at the phase boundary & advec-tion, dispersion, diffusion |
1. Continuum or equivalent continuum models - Porous rocks are represented as a spacial replication of a represen-tative elementary volume (REV) and in such a way statistically homogenized. With a continuum model, the dispersion-advection equation is applied for such media. With an equivalent continuum model, the fractured rock masses are assimilated to the equivalent porous media and the fluid flow within such media is modelled. Variables are defined by their |
|||||||||||
radioactive tracers, various salts |
Detergents |
hot water, salty marine water |
bacteria, viruses, colloids, suspended matter |
various non-aqueous phase liquids ( NAPL) with light |
||||||||||||
Radionucleids use in water diffusion studies |
2. Discrete flow models - fluid flow in the discontinuities or channels is explicitly modelled. TGoverning flow equations are either derived for the individual discontinuities or channels or as the mass flow equations for the complete discontinuity or channel network. In the first case, the variables are defined for the individual discontinuities. In the second case, the discontinuity (or channel) network variables are defined either for the individual, clearly distingui-shable discontinuity (channel) sets, or s tochastically, with an equivalent random |
|||||||||||||||
Radionucleid |
Half life (years) |
applications |
||||||||||||||
2H 18O water |
stable |
Origin of water, identification of recharge areas, hydraulic connections, aquifer leakage, mixing of water, salinization mechanism, recycling of irrigation water, geothermal activity |
||||||||||||||
3H water |
12.43 |
Identification of recent recharge, transport in the measured zone |
||||||||||||||
3He 4He water |
stable |
Determination of retention time |
||||||||||||||
11B | stable |
Identification of sewage effluents |
||||||||||||||
13C | stable |
Disolved inorganic carbon, organic compounds, origin of carbon compounds, identification of paleowaters, grounwaters dynamics, identification and origin of pollutants, biomarkers |
3. Double and triple porosity models - Rock matrix and the discontinuity (channel) network are considered here as two distinct but overlapping continua, modelled with different but hydraulically coupled models. Rock matrix is model-led with an equivalent continuum model and the discontinuity network isgenerally modelled in the same way.
|
|||||||||||||
14C | 5730 |
Groundwater dynamics, identification of paleowaters |
||||||||||||||
15N 18O | Stable |
Groundwater dynamics, identification of paleowaters |
||||||||||||||
34S18O | Stable |
Identification of soruces of pollution, acidification, salinization, acid mine drainage, groundwater flow in geothermal systems |
||||||||||||||
32Si | 100 |
Dating shallow groundwater, weathering rates, exposure ages |
||||||||||||||
36Cl | 306000 |
Dating rock-water interaction |
|
|||||||||||||
37Cl | stable |
Identification of sorucesof pollution, salinisation |
|
|||||||||||||
39Ar | 269 |
dating |
|
|||||||||||||
81Kr | 210000 |
dating |
|
|||||||||||||
85Kr | 10.8 |
Transport mechanisms (fissure flow), delineation of protection zones |
|
|||||||||||||
234U | 250000 |
Dating, rock-water interaction |
|