Have clear before all this coloured pictures on quantification, that either by the rigorous axiomatic logic of mathematics either by the termination and truncations of computed algorithms it should be usual to reach pivot(s) of mathematical formulation. In the hope that quantic computation will help to go fast and more effective with the multivalued oligo-general-solvability of scientific issues. So picturing such processes with ideographs is anyhow weird as far as the democratic processes of shaping them together have not been admitted and a trusted computed aid to support formulation has not been involved.
So for the intermediate purpose of training, cognitive understanding, democratically shared process, education you can use olicognograph with the purpose to share democraticlly processes of what we have called social algebra. Expert of exact sciences and finance should have their moments and spaces for setting material and financial limits. But responsibilities of democracy have to be assumed.
Now, with quantification it is essential to reach at popular leven, even in a intuitive way, some common sense understanding to help, accept and play. Too often this core part is delegated to the 'simplifications of extended mathematics', more applied by manipulators rather than by socially responsible mathematicians or logicians. As a result democracy cannot even have a word to discuss about very criticizable models (for example the first time of neoliberalism proceeded: with one model the same for any country). And plenty of wiser formalists, more careful, explaining well the limits of modelling, cannot have their say for being 'not positive' with worned paradigms.
Paradigms ? - may be the revolution of information made them obsolete, at least the determinist ones; but good social and democratic manners are still much in need, increasingly with all their potential of cultural expressions.